ambossIconambossIcon

Aortic valve stenosis

Last updated: August 4, 2023

Summarytoggle arrow icon

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a valvular heart disease characterized by narrowing of the aortic valve. As a result, the outflow of blood from the left ventricle into the aorta is obstructed. This leads to chronic and progressive excess load on the left ventricle and potentially left ventricular failure. The patient may remain asymptomatic for long periods of time; for this reason, AS is often detected late when it first becomes symptomatic (dyspnea on exertion, angina pectoris, or syncope). Auscultation reveals a harsh, crescendo-decrescendo murmur in systole that radiates to the carotids, and pulses are delayed with diminished carotid upstrokes. Echocardiography is the noninvasive gold standard for diagnosis. Patients with mild asymptomatic aortic stenosis are treated conservatively with monitoring and medical management of related conditions (e.g., hypertension). Symptomatic patients, or those with severe aortic valve stenosis, require immediate aortic valve replacement (AVR) as definitive treatment. Options for valve replacement include surgical AVR or transcatheter AVR (TAVR) for patients with high operative risk. Patients with severe AS have a high risk of developing acute complications such as heart failure and cardiogenic shock, which are challenging to manage and often require critical care interventions and expedited surgery or TAVR.

Epidemiologytoggle arrow icon

Epidemiological data refers to the US, unless otherwise specified.

Etiologytoggle arrow icon

The most common etiologies of valvular aortic stenosis include:

Aortic valve sclerosis occurs without aortic stenosis in its early stages, but can progress to aortic stenosis once signs of LVOT obstruction begin to occur. [5]

Pathophysiologytoggle arrow icon

References:[6][7]

Clinical featurestoggle arrow icon

Aortic stenosis may remain asymptomatic for years, particularly with mild or moderate stenosis. Symptoms usually start to develop when the disease progresses to severe AS, and may present at rest or on exertion.

To remember the three major symptoms of aortic valve stenosis, think: SAD (syncope, angina, dyspnea).

References:[6][8]

Classificationtoggle arrow icon

American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) staging system [9][10]

  • Used to monitor disease progression and determine the need for intervention
  • Based on echocardiographic criteria of valve anatomy and hemodynamics
    • Aortic valve area (AVA): the opening area of the aortic valve measured during systole and an important factor in the evaluation of severity of aortic valve stenosis
    • Transaortic velocity: the maximum velocity of blood flow measured across the aortic valve during systole; inversely related to the aortic valve area
    • Mean aortic pressure gradient: the difference in pressure between the left ventricle and the ascending aorta during systole
      • Pressures normally equilibrate relatively rapidly when the valve opens.
      • Valvular stenosis limits the increase in aortic pressure while increasing the LV pressure, leading to a higher gradient.
  • The term critical aortic stenosis is commonly used to describe severe AS and/or decompensated AS, however, there is a lack of consensus on the defining parameters. [11][12]
AHA/ACC staging for aortic valve stenosis [9][10]
Severity Definition AVA Transaortic velocity Mean aortic pressure gradient
Mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis Stage A aortic valve stenosis At risk of AS 3–4 cm2 < 2.0 m/second < 10 mm Hg
Stage B aortic valve stenosis Progressive AS Mild: 1.5–2.9 cm2 2.0– 2.9 m/second 10–19 mm Hg
Moderate: 1.0–1.4 cm2 3.0–3.9 m/second 20–39 mm Hg
Severe aortic stenosis Stage C1 aortic valve stenosis Asymptomatic severe AS (LVEF normal) ≤ 1.0 cm2 ≥ 4.0 m/second ≥ 40 mm Hg
Stage C2 aortic valve stenosis

Asymptomatic severe AS with LV dysfunction (LVEF < 50%)

Stage D aortic valve stenosis Symptomatic severe AS

Diagnosticstoggle arrow icon

Initial evaluation

Echocardiography [9]

Other

Additional evaluation [9]

Low-dose dobutamine stress testing

Exercise stress testing

Exercise stress testing is contraindicated in patients with severe symptomatic AS (stage D).

Cardiac catheterization

Advanced imaging [9][19]

Consider the following noninvasive imaging options in the perioperative assessment of patients with severe AS, along with expert consultation.

  • Cardiac CT
    • Used in select patients to rule out concomitant CAD if pretest probability is low
    • Can quantify valve calcification
    • Useful for specific measurements required prior to TAVR
  • Cardiac MRI
    • Provides precise information on anatomy and hemodynamics
    • Can be helpful in evaluating severity of AS but is not always available

Differential diagnosistoggle arrow icon

Treatmenttoggle arrow icon

AS is a progressive condition that is definitively treated with aortic valve replacement or repair, the urgency of which depends on disease severity (see “Staging aortic valve stenosis”).

Approach [9]

Supportive care

Managing comorbidities [9][10]

Screen and treat all patients for ASCVD risk factors (see “ASCVD prevention”). [9]

Echocardiographic monitoring [28]

  • Regular follow-up imaging is indicated for asymptomatic patients with:
    • Mild stage B AS: every 3–5 years
    • Moderate stage B AS: every 1–2 years
    • Any stage C AS: every 6–12 months
  • On-demand imaging is indicated for patients with:
    • Any change in signs or symptoms
    • Conditions that have high hemodynamic/metabolic demands

Prophylactic antibiotics [28]

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) and repair [9]

Indications

The presence of exertional symptoms (dyspnea on exertion, angina pectoris, syncope) is an indication for surgery.

Procedure

The choice of valve type and procedure approach involves shared decision-making based on multiple factors (e.g., anticoagulation risks, age, life expectancy). Refer candidates to a specialized heart valve team. [9]

  • Surgical AVR (SAVR) is recommended for patients with:
  • Transcatheter AVR (TAVR)
    • Recommended for patients with:
      • Age > 80 years
      • Life expectancy < 10 years
      • High or prohibitive surgical risk and predicted survival of > 12 months [9]
    • Emergency TAVR may be considered in certain patient groups. [30][31][32]
  • Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty [9]
    • May be used in children, adolescents, and young adults
    • Limited role in older patients
    • Can consider as a bridging intervention in high-risk patients with stage D AS but overall benefit is questionable. [9]

Complications of aortic valve replacement [33][34][35]

Antithrombotic therapy after aortic valve replacement

Antithrombotic therapy for patients with prosthetic aortic valves [9]
Choice of agent Target INR Duration of therapy
Mechanical valve and no risk factors for thromboembolism
  • 2.5 (range 2.0–3.0)
  • Lifelong

Mechanical valve and ≥ 1 risk factor for thromboembolism

OR older generation mechanical valves

  • 3.0 (range 2.5–3.5)

Bioprosthetic valve with low risk of bleeding

  • 2.5 (range 2.0–3.0)

The safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with mechanical valves have not been assessed and their use is not recommended. [9]

Dabigatran results in more thrombotic events and bleeding complications in patients with valvulopathy than warfarin. [9]

Complicationstoggle arrow icon

Critical complications of AS

The following can rapidly lead to decompensation and circulatory collapse in patients with severe AS:

Management [36]

Focus on acute stabilization while expediting definitive surgical treatment.

Do not delay surgical treatment of patients with AS and cardiogenic shock, rapid A-fib, and AHF.

Hemodynamic stabilization in severe AS [36]

Manage hemodynamically unstable patients with severe AS in consultation with a specialist while awaiting definitive surgical treatment.

Severe AS is a preload-dependent condition. Ensure adequate volume repletion prior to positive pressure ventilation to prevent circulatory collapse. [38]

Titrate diuretics and negative inotropic medications very carefully in severe AS as these can worsen cardiogenic shock and myocardial ischemia.

We list the most important complications. The selection is not exhaustive.

Acute management checklisttoggle arrow icon

The following applies to unstable patients with aortic stenosis:

Prognosistoggle arrow icon

  • Asymptomatic patients: Mortality rate is < 1% in a given year. [24]
  • Symptomatic patients: Mortality rate in the first 2 years is > 50% if left untreated. [39]

Referencestoggle arrow icon

  1. Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Loscalzo J. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, Twentieth Edition (Vol.1 & Vol.2). McGraw-Hill Education / Medical ; 2018
  2. Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. The Lancet. 2009; 373 (9667): p.956-966.doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60211-7 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  3. Siu SC, Silversides CK. Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55 (25): p.2789-2800.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.068 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  4. Milin AC, Vorobiof G, Aksoy O, Ardehali R. Insights Into Aortic Sclerosis and Its Relationship With Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2014; 3 (5).doi: 10.1161/jaha.114.001111 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  5. Osnabrugge RLJ, Mylotte D, Head SJ, et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62 (11): p.1002-1012.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.015 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  6. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2020; 143 (5).doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000923 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  7. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63 (22): p.e57-185.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  8. Wayangankar SA, Dasari TW, Lozano PM, Beckman KJ. A Case of Critical Aortic Stenosis Masquerading as Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cardiology Research and Practice. 2010; 2010: p.1-4.doi: 10.4061/2010/423465 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  9. Kang DH, Park SJ, Rim JH, et al. Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Asymptomatic Very Severe Aortic Stenosis. Circulation. 2010; 121 (13): p.1502-1509.doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.909903 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  10. Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Lameson JL, Loscalzo J. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. McGraw-Hill Education ; 2015
  11. Otto CM. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of aortic stenosis in adults. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis-of-aortic-stenosis-in-adults. Last updated: October 24, 2016. Accessed: October 4, 2017.
  12. Crawford MH. Current Diagnosis and Treatment: Cardiology. Lange ; 2013
  13. Naqvi TZ. Echocardiography in transcatheter aortic (Core)Valve implantation: Part 2-Transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2018; 35 (7): p.1020-1041.doi: 10.1111/echo.14034 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  14. Solberg OG, Ueland T, Wergeland R, et al. High-sensitive troponin T and N-terminal-brain-natriuretic-peptide predict outcome in symptomatic aortic stenosis. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2012; 46 (5): p.278-285.doi: 10.3109/14017431.2012.687836 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  15. Røsjø H, Andreassen J, Edvardsen T, Omland T. Prognostic Usefulness of Circulating High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Aortic Stenosis and Relation to Echocardiographic Indexes of Cardiac Function and Anatomy. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2011; 108 (1): p.88-91.doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.346 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  16. Kupari M, Eriksson S, Turto H, Lommi J, Petterson K. Leakage of cardiac troponin I in aortic valve stenosis. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2005; 258 (3): p.231-237.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01529.x . | Open in Read by QxMD
  17. Falk V, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2017; 52 (4): p.616-664.doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx324 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  18. Nishimura RA, Carabello BA. Hemodynamics in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory of the 21st Century. Circulation. 2012; 125 (17): p.2138-2150.doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.111.060319 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  19. Clavel M-A, Malouf J, Messika-Zeitoun D, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aortic Valve Area Calculation in Aortic Stenosis by CT and Doppler Echocardiography. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015; 8 (3): p.248-257.doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.009 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  20. Marquis-Gravel G, Redfors B, Leon MB, Généreux P. Medical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis. Circulation. 2016; 134 (22): p.1766-1784.doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.023997 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  21. Kang TS, Park S. Antihypertensive Treatment in Severe Aortic Stenosis. Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018; 26 (2): p.45.doi: 10.4250/jcvi.2018.26.e9 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  22. Jimenez-Candil J. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertensive patients with aortic valve stenosis: a drug withdrawal study. Heart. 2005; 91 (10): p.1311-1318.doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.047233 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  23. Routledge H, Townend J. ACE inhibition in aortic stenosis: dangerous medicine or golden opportunity?. Journal of Human Hypertension. 2001; 15 (10): p.659-667.doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001260 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  24. Pellikka PA, Sarano ME, Nishimura RA, et al. Outcome of 622 Adults With Asymptomatic, Hemodynamically Significant Aortic Stenosis During Prolonged Follow-Up. Circulation. 2005; 111 (24): p.3290-3295.doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.104.495903 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  25. Yoon S-H, Schmidt T, Bleiziffer S, et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017; 70 (22): p.2752-2763.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.006 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  26. Franzone A, Pilgrim T, Stortecky S, Windecker S. Evolving Indications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions. Current Cardiology Reports. 2017; 19 (11).doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0921-3 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  27. Banovic M, Athithan L, McCann GP. Aortic stenosis and diabetes mellitus: An ominous combination. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research. 2019; 16 (4): p.310-323.doi: 10.1177/1479164118820657 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  28. Frederiksen TC, Krogh Christiansen M, Charmoth Østergaard P, et al. QTc Interval and Risk of Cardiac Events in Adults With Anorexia Nervosa. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2018; 11 (8).doi: 10.1161/circep.117.005995 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  29. Gerber MA, Baltimore RS, Eaton CB, et al. Prevention of Rheumatic Fever and Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Streptococcal Pharyngitis. Circulation. 2009; 119 (11): p.1541-1551.doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.191959 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  30. Huang H, Kovach C, Reisman M, et al. TCT-100 Emergency TAVR for Cardiogenic Shock—right heart function and early mechanical circulatory support improve outcomes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018; 72 (13): p.B43-B44.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1198 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  31. Masha L, Vemulapalli S, Manandhar P, et al. Demographics, Procedural Characteristics, and Clinical Outcomes When Cardiogenic Shock Precedes TAVR in the United States. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2020; 13 (11): p.1314-1325.doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.033 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  32. Kolte D, Khera S, Vemulapalli S, et al. Outcomes Following Urgent/Emergent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2018; 11 (12): p.1175-1185.doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.002 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  33. Kolkailah AA, Doukky R, Pelletier MP, Volgman AS, Kaneko T, Nabhan AF. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019.doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd013319.pub2 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  34. Virtanen MPO, Eskola M, Jalava MP, et al. Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low Operative Risk. Jorunal of the American Medical Association. 2019; 2 (6): p.e195742.doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5742 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  35. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012; 366 (18): p.1686-1695.doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1200384 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  36. Gottlieb M, Long B, Koyfman A. Evaluation and Management of Aortic Stenosis for the Emergency Clinician: An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature. J Emerg Med. 2018; 55 (1): p.34-41.doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.01.026 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  37. Aksoy O, Yousefzai R, Singh D, et al. Cardiogenic shock in the setting of severe aortic stenosis: role of intra-aortic balloon pump support. Heart. 2010; 97 (10): p.838-843.doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.206367 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  38. Mahmood SS, Pinsky MR. Heart-lung interactions during mechanical ventilation: the basics. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2018; 6 (18): p.349-349.doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.04.29 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  39. Otto CM, Prendergast B. Aortic-Valve Stenosis — From Patients at Risk to Severe Valve Obstruction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014; 371 (8): p.744-756.doi: 10.1056/nejmra1313875 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  40. Saikrishnan N, Kumar G, Sawaya FJ, Lerakis S, Yoganathan AP. Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis: a review of diagnostic modalities and hemodynamics. Circulation. 2014; 129 (2): p.244-253.doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002310 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  41. Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Medical Management of Nonsurgical Patients. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23547127. Updated: February 13, 2017. Accessed: March 21, 2018.
  42. Ren X. Aortic Stenosis. Aortic Stenosis. New York, NY: WebMD. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/150638. Updated: December 11, 2016. Accessed: February 26, 2017.
  43. Stritzke J, Linsel-nitschke P, Markus MR, et al. Association between degenerative aortic valve disease and long-term exposure to cardiovascular risk factors: results of the longitudinal population-based KORA/MONICA survey. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30 (16): p.2044-2053.doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp287 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  44. Mohty D, Pislaru S. Valvular heart disease in elderly adults. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/valvular-heart-disease-in-elderly-adults. Last updated: December 22, 2016. Accessed: November 28, 2017.
  45. Van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017; 136 (16).doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000525 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  46. Grimard BH, Safford RE, Burns EL. Aortic Stenosis: Diagnosis and Treatment.. American Family Physician. 2016; 93 (5): p.371-8.
  47. Bayer MF. Acute pulmonary edema due to stress cardiomyopathy in a patient with aortic stenosis: a case report. Cases Journal. 2009; 2 (1).doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-2-9128 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  48. Yan AT, Koh M, Chan KK, et al. Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Aortic Stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017; 69 (12): p.1523-1532.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.025 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  49. Natorska J, Wypasek E, Grudzień G, et al. Does Diabetes Accelerate the Progression of Aortic Stenosis through Enhanced Inflammatory Response within Aortic valves?. Inflammation. 2011; 35 (3): p.834-840.doi: 10.1007/s10753-011-9384-7 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  50. Testuz A, Nguyen V, Mathieu T, et al. Influence of metabolic syndrome and diabetes on progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis. International Journal of Cardiology. 2017; 244: p.248-253.doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.104 . | Open in Read by QxMD

Icon of a lock3 free articles remaining

You have 3 free member-only articles left this month. Sign up and get unlimited access.
 Evidence-based content, created and peer-reviewed by physicians. Read the disclaimer