ambossIconambossIcon

ECG

Last updated: December 18, 2023

Summarytoggle arrow icon

Electrocardiography is an important diagnostic tool in cardiology. External electrodes are used to measure the electrical conduction signals of the heart and record them as lines on graph paper (i.e., an electrocardiogram; ECG). The interpretation of the amplitude and duration of these lines allows for the assessment of normal cardiac physiology as well as the detection of cardiac arrhythmias, conduction system abnormalities, and/or ischemia. This article provides an overview of the most essential components of the ECG and describes its clinical application and the characteristic ECG findings for common diseases.

Procedure/applicationtoggle arrow icon

Overview [1][2]

  • Definition: An ECG represents a recording of the electrical activity of the heart that is captured via external electrodes and transcribed onto graph paper as ECG leads (for more information on the electrical activity of the heart, see “Conducting system of the heart”).
  • Electrodes
    • Physical conductive pads attached to the patient's chest and limbs
    • Detect the direction of the depolarization vectors
  • Leads : graphical representation of the depolarization vectors of the heart
    • Six precordial leads (V1–V6) capture the electrical activity of the heart in a horizontal plane.
    • Six limb leads (I, II, III, aVL, aVF, aVR ) capture the electrical activity of the heart in a vertical plane.
      • Input from three of the limb electrodes is combined to form the six limb leads.
      • The fourth electrode is neutral.

ECG electrode placement [1][2]

Anatomical relationships of leads [1][2]

See also “Localization of the myocardial infarction on ECG.”

Anatomical relationships of ECG leads
Limb leads Precordial leads Corresponding heart structure
Inferior leads
  • II
  • III
  • aVF
  • N/A
  • Inferior surface of the heart
Lateral leads
  • I
  • aVL
  • V5
  • V6
Anteroseptal leads
  • N/A
  • V1–V4
  • Anterior wall of both ventricles
  • Ventricular septum
Right-sided leads
  • N/A
Posterior leads
  • N/A

ECG paper [1]

  • ECG paper speed
    • In the US, the ECG paper speed is generally 25 mm/s.
    • Alternatively, a paper speed of 50 mm/s can be used.
  • Machine calibration: 1 mV = 1 cm (i.e., 1 mV of electrical activity results in a 1 cm vertical deflection on the grid paper)
  • Rhythm strip: a prolonged 10-second recording of a lead (usually lead II)
  • ECG grid paper
    • Small squares of 1 mm2
      • Horizontally: 1 mm = 0.04 s (0.02 s for a paper speed of 50 mm/s)
      • Vertically: 1 mm = 0.1 mV
    • Large squares of 5 mm2
      • Horizontally: 5 mm = 5 x 0.04 s = 0.2 s (0.1 s for a paper speed of 50 mm/s)
      • Vertically: 5 mm = 5 x 0.1 mV = 0.5 mV

It is easy to misinterpret an ECG if the paper speed and calibration are not taken into account.

ECG lead reversal or incorrect placement [5]

Electrode or lead reversal or incorrect placement can alter ECG findings. The following are common findings associated with specific types of reversal or incorrect placement.

Limb lead reversal [5]

  • Left (L) arm/right (R) arm (most common)
  • R arm/L leg: all leads inverted (except for aVL)
  • R leg/other limb: One lead appears almost flat.
  • L arm/L leg: Changes may be subtle and are usually only detected when compared to previous ECGs.
    • Lead I switched with lead II
    • aVL switched with aVF
    • Lead III inverted
  • L arm/L leg and R arm/R leg
    • Lead I appears flat.
    • aVL and aVR appear identical.
    • Lead II appears as an inverted lead III.

Precordial lead reversal or incorrect placement [5][6][7]

  • Reversal
    • Usually manifests as disruption of normal P-, QRS-, and T-wave progression
    • Suspect misconnected cables if a sudden change in wave morphology returns to normal in the next lead.
  • Incorrect placement
    • Changes are often subtle and difficult to detect.
    • Common misplacements: placement of V1 and V2 too superiorly and V5 and V6 too medially [6]
    • May appear as false reversed or poor R-wave progression, which may be mistaken for an anterior MI [7]

Troubleshooting [5]

  • Compare with a prior ECG if possible.
  • Verify correct ECG lead placement at the bedside and repeat the ECG if in doubt.

ECG artifact [5][8]

  • Definition: ECG distortions not related to cardiac electrical activity
  • Physiological artifact
    • Often caused by motion
    • Repetitive narrow spikes (may have a similar appearance to dysrhythmias): caused by small amplitude movements (e.g., tremors, shivering)
    • Wandering baseline: caused by large amplitude movements (e.g., patient movement, inadequate electrode contact)
  • Nonphysiological artifact
    • Often caused by electrical interference
    • Appears as an indistinct or thick baseline; may make rhythm analysis difficult
  • Artifact reduction methods [5]
    • Avoid placing electrodes over bony prominences and major muscles.
    • Shave thick hair and clean and dry the skin prior to placement.
    • Connect the ECG to a grounded outlet and turn off nearby electronics to minimize nonphysiological artifact.

Suspect artifact if ECG findings do not correlate with the clinical picture, e.g., apparent ventricular tachycardia in an asymptomatic, hemodynamically stable patient. [5]

Interpretation/findingstoggle arrow icon

ECG components [2][9]

Overview

  • Wave: a deflection of the ECG line due to any change in the electrical activity of the heart (e.g., P wave, T wave)
    • Positive (upward) deflection: the electrical impulse is moving toward the electrode
    • Negative (downward) deflection: the electrical impulse is moving away from the electrode
    • Equiphasic (equally upward and downward) deflection: the electrical impulse is moving perpendicular to the electrode
    • Some waves form complexes (e.g., QRS complex).
  • Segment: the line between two different waves, excluding the waves (e.g., ST segment)
  • Interval: includes a segment and one (or more) waves (e.g., PR interval)

Key components [10]

Approach to ECG interpretation [2]

  • When interpreting an ECG, it is important to keep in mind the patient's clinical picture and, if possible, compare the current ECG with previous ones.
  • A thorough ECG interpretation algorithm should assess:
    1. Heart rhythm (best seen in lead II)
    2. Heart rate (any lead)
    3. Cardiac axis (leads I and aVF)
    4. P-wave morphology and size (best seen in lead II)
    5. PR-interval duration (best seen in lead II)
    6. QRS-complex morphology and duration (assessed in all leads individually)
    7. ST-segment morphology (assessed in all leads individually)
    8. T-wave morphology (assessed in all leads individually)
    9. QT-interval duration (lead aVL)
    10. U-wave morphology (leads V2–V4)

Determination of heart rate and rhythmtoggle arrow icon

Determination of the heart rhythm [1]

Sinus rhythm

Determination of the heart rate [1]

  • The ventricular rate can be calculated by using the frequency of the QRS complexes, which correlate with ventricular systoles.
  • The atrial rate, which correlates with atrial systole, can be calculated by using the frequency of the P waves (e.g., when assessing supraventricular arrhythmias).
  • In clinical settings, the heart rate can be measured with an ECG ruler.

Heart rate (HR) estimation methods

  • Regular QRS rhythm
    • HR = 300/number of large (5 mm2) boxes between two successive QRS complexes (e.g., if you count 5 large boxes between one R wave and the next, the HR is approx. 300 ÷ 5 = 60/min)
    • HR = 150/RR interval in cm (e.g., if there are 2 cm in between two consecutive R waves, HR = 150/2 = 75/min)
    • HR = 60/RR interval in seconds (e.g., if there is a 0.5 s interval between two successive R waves, HR = 60/0.5 = 120/min)
  • Irregular QRS rhythm: HR = 6 x total number of QRS complexes on a standard 10-second ECG rhythm strip (e.g., if you count 10 QRS complexes on a standard 10-second ECG rhythm strip, the HR is approx. 6 x 10 = 60/min)

Normal resting heart rate according to age

Normal resting heart rate according to age [13]

Age Bradycardia Normal heart rate Tachycardia
Newborns (0–1 month)

< 70/min

70–190/min

> 190/min

Infants (1–11 months)

< 80/min

80–160/min

> 160/min

Children (1–2 years)

< 80/min

80–130/min

> 130/min

Children (3–4 years)

< 80/min

80–120/min

> 120/min

Children (5–6 years)

< 75/min

75–115/min

> 115/min

Children (7–9 years)

< 70/min

70–110/min

> 110/min

Children (> 10 years)

Adults

< 60/min

60–100/min

> 100/min

Adult athletes

< 40/min

40–60/min

> 60/min

Determination of the cardiac axistoggle arrow icon

Definition [1]

Methods for determining the cardiac axis [1]

There are several methods to determine the cardiac axis using the QRS complex polarity. The axis is calculated according to the hexaxial reference system (Cabrera circle).

  • Isoelectric (equiphasic) QRS complex method
    1. Determine the lead in which the QRS complexes are isoelectric (equally positive and negative).
    2. Assess the two leads perpendicular to this lead on the Cabrera circle.
    3. The cardiac axis corresponds to the perpendicular lead with positive QRS complexes.
  • Leads I and aVF method
    1. Determine the QRS complex polarity in leads I and aVF.
      • Positive QRS complex: the area above the isoelectric line and under the curve is larger than the area under the isoelectric line above the curve
      • Negative QRS complex: the area under the isoelectric line and above the curve is larger than the area above the isoelectric line and under the curve
    2. The cardiac axis can be approximated by evaluating the combinations of the QRS complex polarities in leads I and aVF. [14]
      • Positive in both leads I and aVF: normal axis (0° to 90°)
      • Positive in lead I and negative in aVF: left axis deviation (-90° to -30°) or normal axis (-30° to 0°)
      • Negative in lead I and positive in aVF: right axis deviation (90° to 180°)
      • Negative in both leads I and aVF: extreme right axis deviation (-180° to -90°)
    3. Lead II can be used for a more accurate determination of the cardiac axis if the QRS complex is positive in lead I and negative in aVF.

Cardiac axis deviation

Deviation of the cardiac axis [15]
Axis QRS polarity Degrees Common causes
Lead I Lead aVF
Left axis deviation
  • +
  • -
  • -90° to -30°
Normal
  • +
  • +
  • -30° to 90°
  • Normal axis
Right axis deviation
  • -
  • +
  • 90° to 180°
Extreme right axis deviation
  • -
  • -
  • -180° to -90°

P wavetoggle arrow icon

  • Physiology [10]
  • Morphology [10]
    • Present in all leads
    • Duration: < 0.12 s (in all leads) [16]
    • Amplitude: < 0.25 mV (in all leads) [17]
    • Polarity
      • Positive in leads I, II, and aVF
      • Negative in lead aVR
      • Biphasic in lead V1: negative deflection < 1 mm [16]
Abnormalities of the P wave [10][17]
Abnormality ECG findings Pathophysiology Etiology
P pulmonale
  • Amplitude: ≥ 0.25 mV in leads II, III, and aVF [17]
P mitrale
  • Duration: ≥ 0.12 sec
  • Polarity
    • Bifid in lead II: peak-to-peak interval of > 0.04 sec
    • Biphasic in lead V1: negative deflection > 1 mm [16]
P biatriale
  • Biatrial enlargement

PR intervaltoggle arrow icon

Abnormalities of the PR interval [20]
Criteria ECG findings Pathophysiology Etiology
Duration
  • ≤ 0.12 s
  • Ectopic electrical pathways → faster impulse transmission to the ventricles → shorter PR interval
  • ≥ 0.2 s
  • Delay of electrical impulse transmission at the AV node slower transmission to the ventricles → longer PR interval
  • Malfunctioning of infranodal or AV nodal cells → failure of impulse transmission to the ventricles → dropped QRS complex
Relationship to QRS
Amplitude
  • PR-segment depression
  • Atrial injury or inflammation → abnormal atrial repolarization PR-segment depression [21]

QRS complextoggle arrow icon

Overview

Physiology [9]

QRS complex components [9]

Morphology [9]

“From V1 to V5, there's sunSet and sunRise”: From leads V1 to V5, S wave Sets while R wave Rises.

QRS complex abnormalities

Abnormalities of QRS-complex waves

Overview of QRS-complex wave abnormalities
Abnormality ECG findings Pathophysiology Etiology
Pathological Q waves [9][24]
  • Abnormally wide (≥ 40 ms)
  • Abnormally deep (≥ 0.2 mV or > 25% of the R wave amplitude) or detectable in V1–V3
Dominant R wave [17]
  • Tall R wave in lead V1
  • Normal in children and young adults
Poor R-wave progression [26]
  • Absence of the normal increase in the size of R waves from lead V1 to V6
  • May be a normal variant
  • Ventricular depolarization vector reduced or directed posteriorly → deviation of the depolarization vector away from electrodes → insufficient increase in the size of the R wave and deep S waves
Persistent S wave

A new pathological Q wave is most likely an indication of myocardial infarction.

Bundle branch blocks

  • Incomplete bundle branch block: QRS duration of 0.1–0.12 s
  • Complete bundle branch block: QRS duration ≥ 0.12 s
Bundle branch blocks
Abnormality ECG findings Pathophysiology Etiology
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) [15][20]
  • No R wave in lead V1
  • Deep S waves (forming a characteristic W shape)
  • Wide, notched R waves in leads I, aVL, V5, V6 (forming a characteristic M shape)
  • Loss of Q waves in the lateral leads [27]
Right bundle branch block (RBBB) [15]
  • An rsr', rsR', or rSR' complex (forming a characteristic “rabbit ears” or M shape) in leads V1, V2
  • Tall secondary R wave in lead V1
  • Wide, slurred S wave in leads I, V5, V6
  • Associated feature: ST segment depression and T-wave inversion in leads V1, V2, and sometimes V3
  • Usually a normal axis
  • Normal variant in ∼ 5% of individuals [10]
Bifascicular block [28]
  • An RBBB with either of the following:
    • Left anterior fascicular block (common form)
      • Left axis deviation
      • qR pattern in lead aVL
    • Left posterior fascicular block (rare)
      • Right axis deviation
      • rS pattern in leads I and aVL
      • qR pattern in leads III and aVF

New-onset left bundle branch block with concurrent angina should be treated immediately as acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

WiLLiaM MoRRoW:” In LBBB the QRS looks like a W in V1 and an M in V6 (WiLLiaM), in RBBB the QRS looks like an M in V1 and a W in V6 (MoRRoW).

Ventricular hypertrophy

Ventricular hypertrophy
Abnormality ECG findings Pathophysiology Etiology
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) [16]
  • Increased muscle mass (hypertrophy) → taller R waves (in leads V5, V6) and S waves (in leads V1, V2)
Right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) [17]
  • Any of the following may suggest RVH: [29]
    • Right axis deviation
    • Dominant R wave in lead V1 (R wave > 0.6 mV or R/S > 1)
    • Deep S wave in lead V5 (> 1 mV) or V6 (> 0.3 mV)
    • Sokolow-Lyon criteria: RV1 or R2 + SV5 or S6 ≥ 1.05 mV
  • Increased muscle mass (hypertrophy) → taller R waves (in leads V1, V2) and deeper S waves (in leads V5, V6)

R1ght 5ignS:” R in V1 and S in V5 are the dominant waves seen in right ventricular hypertrophy.

ST segmenttoggle arrow icon

Overview [9]

  • Physiology: represents the interval between ventricular depolarization and repolarization [31]
  • Morphology
    • Horizontal isoelectric line, but may slope upward slightly before the T wave
    • Extends from the J point (end of the S wave) to the start of the T wave

Abnormalities of the ST segment

Abnormalities of the ST segment [32]
Abnormality ECG findings Etiology
ST elevation [33]
ST depression [35]
  • ≥ 0.05 mV (or 0.5 mm) in leads V2 and V3
  • ≥ 0.1 mV in all other leads
  • Downsloping ST depression or horizontal ST depression
  • Upsloping ST depression
  • Sagging type ST-segment depression
J wave [37]
  • Positive deflection at the J point

Brugada syndrome [38]

T wavetoggle arrow icon

Overview [9]

  • Physiology: : The T wave represents ventricular repolarization.
  • Morphology
    • Shape: asymmetrical, with the downward slope steeper than the initial upward slope
    • Amplitude: < 10 mm (between 1/8 and 2/3 of the R wave)
    • Polarity: physiologically concordant to the QRS complex (positive if the QRS complex is positive or negative if the QRS complex is negative)

Abnormalities of the T wave

Abnormalities of the T wave [9][41]
Abnormality ECG findings [32] Pathophysiology Etiology
T-wave inversion [42]
  • Amplitude ≥ -0.1 mV
  • May be a normal finding in:
    • Leads III, aVR, or V1
    • Children
  • New-onset T-wave inversion (i.e., not present on the patient's previous ECGs)
T-wave flattening
  • Amplitude between 0.1 mV and -0.1 mV
  • T wave appears flatter than normal.
Peaked T wave
  • Tall, narrow
  • Symmetrically peaked
  • Asymmetrically peaked
Hyperacute T wave
  • Tall, symmetrically peaked
Biphasic T wave
  • T wave consisting of an upward and downward deflection
  • The initial deflection is variable and can be either up or down.

If electrical conduction of the heart is abnormal (e.g., bundle branch block), the ST segment and T wave cannot be reliably evaluated because of abnormal repolarization.

QT intervaltoggle arrow icon

Overview [32]

Corrected QT interval (QTc) [32]

Generally, the QT interval should not be more than half of the RR interval.

Abnormalities of the QT interval

QT interval abnormalities
Condition ECG findings [32] Pathophysiology Etiology
Prolonged QT interval [43]
  • > 450 ms in men
  • > 460 ms in women
Shortened QT interval [44]
  • < 390 ms

A prolonged QT interval is associated with sudden cardiac death, usually due to acute ventricular arrhythmias. [43]

U wavetoggle arrow icon

Clinical applications of ECGtoggle arrow icon

Ambulatory ECG monitoring [45]

  • Description: ECG devices can be used in the outpatient setting to monitor and record the cardiac rhythm over a prolonged period of time.
  • Types
    • Continuous: Holter monitor [46]
      • A continuous, ambulatory, battery-operated ECG recorder worn for 24–48 hours
      • Common metrics
      • Limitations
        • The short duration of monitoring results in a low diagnostic yield.
        • Devices are not waterproof.
        • The patient needs to document symptoms separately.
    • Intermittent
      • Event recorder
        • A device used in the evaluation of arrhythmias or syncope to record the patient's heart rhythm during symptomatic episodes
        • Devices are triggered to record data either by the patient (when experiencing symptoms) or automatically (when an arrhythmia is detected)
      • Loop recorder
        • A type of event recorder that can be triggered either automatically or manually by the patient
        • Records the patient's heart rhythm up to an hour prior to the arrhythmic event as well as during the event
        • External recorders: worn externally for short periods of time (4–6 weeks)
        • Implantable loop recorders: can be used for up to 36 months (e.g., for patients with more infrequent episodes)
    • Pacemakers or implanted cardioverter defibrillators
    • Patient-led monitoring (e.g., via a smartwatch)
  • Indications

Other clinical applications of ECG

Most common ECG abnormalitiestoggle arrow icon

Most common ECG abnormalities
Condition Most relevant ECG findings Most important clinical features
Myocardial infarction
STEMI
Supraventricular tachycardia
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia
Multifocal atrial tachycardia
Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia
  • Rhythm can be regular or irregular
  • Heart rate > 100 bpm
  • P wave with an unusual morphology (highly variable) before each normal QRS
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
Ventricular tachycardia

Torsades de pointes

Tachyarrhythmia

Atrial fibrillation

  • Irregularly irregular RR intervals
  • Commonly tachycardia (atrial rate > ventricular rate)
  • Indiscernible P waves
  • Typically narrow QRS complex (< 0.12 sec)

Atrial flutter

  • Heart rate: typically 75–150/minute (atrial rate ≥ ventricular rate)
  • The rhythm may be:
    • Regularly irregular if atrial flutter occurs with a variable AV block occurring in a fixed pattern (2:1 or 4:1)
    • Irregularly irregular with a variable block
  • Regular, narrow QRS complexes
  • Sawtooth appearance of P waves: identical flutter waves (F waves) that occur in sequence at a rate of ∼ 300/minute

Ventricular fibrillation

AV block
First degree
Second degree Mobitz type I (Wenckebach)
Mobitz type II
  • Single or intermittent nonconducted P waves without QRS complexes
  • The PR interval remains constant
  • The conduction of atrial impulses to the ventricles typically follows a regular pattern.
Third degree
Bundle branch block

Left bundle branch block (LBBB)

  • No R wave in lead V1
  • Deep S waves (forming a characteristic W shape)
  • Wide, notched R waves in leads I, aVL, V5, V6 (forming a characteristic M shape)
  • LBBB itself is asymptomatic.
  • Signs of the underlying condition (e.g., chest pain in MI)

Right bundle branch block (RBBB)

  • An rsr', rsR', or rSR' complex (forming a characteristic “rabbit ears” or M shape) in leads V1, V2
  • Tall secondary R wave in lead V1
  • Wide, slurred S wave in leads I, V5, V6
  • RBBB itself is asymptomatic.
  • Signs of the underlying condition (e.g., cough in COPD)
Hereditary channelopathies

Brugada syndrome

Congenital long QT syndrome

Unspecific changes
Acute pericarditis
Cardiac tamponade
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Restrictive cardiomyopathy
  • Low voltage ECG (especially in amyloidosis)
  • LBBB and other conduction disorders
Pulmonary embolism
Electrolyte imbalances Hypokalemia
Hyperkalemia
Hypocalcemia
Hypercalcemia
Hypomagnesemia
Atrial/ventricular enlargement
Right atrial enlargement
  • Signs of the underlying condition (e.g., cough in COPD)

Left atrial enlargement

Left ventricular hypertrophy
Right ventricular hypertrophy
  • Signs of the underlying condition (e.g., cough in COPD)

Life-threatening ECG findingstoggle arrow icon

STEMI and STEMI equivalents

Conduction abnormalities

Anatomic abnormalities

Systemic abnormalities

Referencestoggle arrow icon

  1. Meek S, Morris F. ABC of clinical electrocardiography - Introduction - Leads, rate, rhythm, and cardiac axis. BMJ. 2002; 324 (7334): p.415-8.
  2. Hampton JR. The ECG Made Easy. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier ; 2013
  3. George A, Arumugham PS, Figueredo VM. aVR - the forgotten lead. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2010; 15 (2): p.e36-e44.
  4. van Gorselen EO, Verheugt FW, Meursing BT, Oude Ophuis AJ. Posterior myocardial infarction: the dark side of the moon.. Neth Heart J. 2007; 15 (1): p.16-21.
  5. Roberts JR. Roberts and Hedges' Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine and Acute Care. Elsevier ; 2018
  6. Medani SA, Hensey M, Caples N, Owens P. Accuracy in precordial ECG lead placement: Improving performance through a peer-led educational intervention. J Electrocardiol. 2018; 51 (1): p.50-54.doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.04.018 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  7. Rehman M, Rehman NU. Precordial ECG Lead Mispositioning: Its Incidence and Estimated Cost to Healthcare. Cureus. 2020.doi: 10.7759/cureus.9040 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  8. Pérez-Riera AR, Barbosa-Barros R, Daminello-Raimundo R, de Abreu LC. Main artifacts in electrocardiography. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017; 23 (2): p.e12494.doi: 10.1111/anec.12494 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  9. Meek S. ABC of clinical electrocardiography: Introduction. II---Basic terminology. BMJ. 2002; 324 (7335): p.470-473.doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7335.470 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  10. Feather A, Randall D, Waterhouse M. Kumar and Clark's Clinical Medicine. Elsevier ; 2020
  11. Nagayoshi Y, Yufu T, Yumoto S. Inverted U-wave and myocardial ischemia. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2018; 111 (7): p.493.doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcy025 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  12. Ben-Tal A, Shamailov SS, Paton JFR. Evaluating the physiological significance of respiratory sinus arrhythmia: looking beyond ventilation-perfusion efficiency. J Physiol. 2012; 590 (8): p.1989-2008.doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.222422 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  13. Pulse. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/003399.htm. Updated: July 2, 2019. Accessed: October 3, 2020.
  14. Kashou AH, Basit H, Chhabra L. Electrical Right and Left Axis Deviation. StatPearls. 2020.
  15. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram. Circulation. 2009; 119 (10).doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.191095 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  16. Edhouse J. ABC of clinical electrocardiography: Conditions affecting the left side of the heart. BMJ. 2002; 324 (7348): p.1264-1267.
  17. Harrigan RA. ABC of clinical electrocardiography: Conditions affecting the right side of the heart. BMJ. 2002; 324 (7347): p.1201-1204.doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1201 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  18. Sethi T, Singh AP, Singla V, Singh Y. Biatrial enlargement: an unusual cause of massive cardiomegaly. Case Reports. 2013; 2013 (jan31 1): p.bcr-2012-008320-bcr-2012-008320.doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-008320 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  19. Ram JL, Conn PM. Conn's Handbook of Models for Human Aging. Academic Press ; 2018
  20. Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74 (7): p.e51-e156.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  21. Kudo Y, Yamasaki F, Doi Y, Sugiura T. Clinical correlates of PR-segment depression in asymptomatic patients with pericardial effusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39 (12): p.2000-2004.doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01889-2 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  22. O'Neal WT, Qureshi WT, Nazarian S, et al. Electrocardiographic Time to Intrinsicoid Deflection and Heart Failure: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.. Clin Cardiol. 2016; 39 (9): p.531-6.doi: 10.1002/clc.22561 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  23. Darouian N, Narayanan K, Aro AL, et al. Delayed intrinsicoid deflection of the QRS complex is associated with sudden cardiac arrest. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (4): p.927-932.doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.12.022 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  24. MacAlpin RN. Significance of Abnormal Q Waves in the Electrocardiograms of Adults Less than 40 Years Old. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2006; 11 (3): p.203-210.doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474x.2006.00105.x . | Open in Read by QxMD
  25. Morris F. ABC of clinical electrocardiography: Acute myocardial infarction - Part I. BMJ. 2002; 324 (7341): p.831-834.doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.831 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  26. MacKenzie R. Poor R-wave progression. J Insur Med. 2005; 37 (1): p.58-62.
  27. Breithardt G, Breithardt OA. Left bundle branch block, an old-new entity.. Journal of cardiovascular translational research. 2012; 5 (2): p.107-16.doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9344-5 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  28. Elizari MV, Acunzo RS, Ferreiro M. Hemiblocks Revisited. Circulation. 2007; 115 (9): p.1154-1163.doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.637389 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  29. Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM, Okin P, Kligfield P, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram. Circulation. 2009; 119 (10).doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.191097 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  30. Salles G, Cardoso C, Nogueira AR, Bloch K, Muxfeldt E. Importance of the Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern in Patients With Resistant Hypertension. Hypertension. 2006; 48 (3): p.437-442.doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000236550.90214.1c . | Open in Read by QxMD
  31. Kashou AH, Kashou HE. Rhythm, ST Segment. StatPearls. 2017.
  32. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram. Circulation. 2009; 119 (10).doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.191096 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  33. Gard JJ, Bader W, Enriquez-Sarano M, Frye RL, Michelena HI. Uncommon Cause of ST Elevation. Circulation. 2011; 123 (9).doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.002477 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  34. Klein LR, Shroff GR, Beeman W, Smith SW. Electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction from left ventricular aneurysm. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33 (6): p.786-790.doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.044 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  35. Pollehn T, Brady WJ, Perron AD, Morris F. The electrocardiographic differential diagnosis of ST segment depression. EMJ. 2002; 19 (2): p.129-135.doi: 10.1136/emj.19.2.129 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  36. Khalid U, Birnbaum Y. Clinical Significance of Upsloping ST Depression on Resting Electrocardiogram. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016; 21 (2): p.202-205.doi: 10.1111/anec.12273 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  37. Antzelevitch C, Yan GX, Ackerman MJ, et al. J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.. Europace. 2017; 19 (4): p.665-694.doi: 10.1093/europace/euw235 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  38. Hayat S, Malik B, Ali Rudwan A, et al. Brugada syndrome: Clinical features, risk stratification, and management. Heart Views. 2020; 21 (2): p.88-96.doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_44_20 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  39. Postema PG, Neville J, de Jong JSSG, Romero K, Wilde AAM, Woosley RL. Safe drug use in long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome: comparison of website statistics. Europace. 2013; 15 (7): p.1042-1049.doi: 10.1093/europace/eut018 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  40. Francis J, Antzelevitch C. Atrial Fibrillation and Brugada Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51 (12): p.1149-1153.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.062 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  41. Sampson M. Ambulatory electrocardiography: indications and devices. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing. 2019; 14 (3): p.114-121.doi: 10.12968/bjca.2019.14.3.114 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  42. Steinberg JS, Varma N, Cygankiewicz I, et al. 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry. Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14 (7): p.e55-e96.doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.03.038 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  43. Channer K, Morris F. ABC of clinical electrocardiography: Myocardial ischaemia. BMJ. 2002; 324 (7344): p.1023-1026.doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7344.1023 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  44. Said SA, Bloo R, de Nooijer R, Slootweg A. Cardiac and non-cardiac causes of T-wave inversion in the precordial leads in adult subjects: A Dutch case series and review of the literature. World J Cardiol. 2015; 7 (2): p.86.doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i2.86 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  45. van Noord C, Eijgelsheim M, Stricker BH. Drug- and non-drug-associated QT interval prolongation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 70 (1): p.16-23.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03660.x . | Open in Read by QxMD
  46. Patel C, Yan G-X, Antzelevitch C. Short QT Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3 (4): p.401-408.doi: 10.1161/circep.109.921056 . | Open in Read by QxMD

Icon of a lockAccess full content

Sign up and get unlimited access.
 Evidence-based content, created and peer-reviewed by physicians. Read the disclaimer