ambossIconambossIcon

Fever in infants ≤ 60 days of age

Last updated: October 31, 2023

Summarytoggle arrow icon

Fever in infants ≤ 60 days of age is a concerning clinical feature as it may be a sign of invasive bacterial infection. The immune system of neonates and young infants is immature and they face additional infection risks compared to older infants, such as vertical transmission of pathogens at birth and vaccine-preventable illnesses. While the etiology may be benign, infant ≤ 60 days old should be fully assessed even if they appear well. The extent of the diagnostic studies required depends on the age of the infant and their clinical status. Management usually consists of empiric antibiotic therapy. Younger neonates require admission; in infants > 21 days old home observation can be considered if select criteria are met.

Traditionally this guidance was extended to all infants ≤ 90 days of age with fever. In 2021, guidance from the AAP suggested that in well-infants > 60 days of age, this strategy risks iatrogenic harm from over-investigation and treatment. For management of fever in children and infants > 60 days of age, see “Pediatric fever.”

Epidemiologytoggle arrow icon

  • Every year approximately 100,000 infants ≤ 60 days of age are assessed for fever in the emergency department. [1]
  • Fever occurs in 1.4% of full-term infants 8–60 days old. [2][3]

Epidemiological data refers to the US, unless otherwise specified.

Etiologytoggle arrow icon

Infants < 28 days old are at a higher risk for life-threatening infections because of an immature immune system. [9]

Clinical featurestoggle arrow icon

Appearance is unreliable in neonates and infants ≤ 60 days of age who may initially look well despite having a life-threatening infection. [11]

Management approachtoggle arrow icon

  • Obtain a full history (including birth history), examine the child, and obtain vital signs.
  • Look for specific sources of infection, e.g., cellulitis; if present, follow established treatment for that condition. [2]
  • If there is no clear source of infection:
    • Assess whether the infant is ill-appearing or looks well. [10]
    • Determine exact age; management of well-appearing infants depends on age.

Initial management of ill-appearing febrile infanttoggle arrow icon

Initial management of well-appearing febrile infanttoggle arrow icon

Overview [2]

  • The advice below is based on AAP guidance and applies to well-appearing infants without:
    • A recognizable serious source of infection [2]
    • Significant past medical history
    • A history of immunization within the preceding 48 hours (if ≥ 8 days of age) [2]
  • Thoroughly evaluate all infants including those with nonspecific symptoms and/or minor infections, to exclude bacteria coinfection. [2]
  • Diagnostic and treatment recommendations differ by age (i.e., 8–21 days, 22–28 days, and 29–60 days).

Diagnostic studies for febrile infants ≤ 60 days of age

All infants

Inflammatory markers are not required in 8–21-day-old infants since empiric IV antibiotics are always started in this age group. However, inflammatory markers can guide management. [2]

Select infants (depending on age and clinical status)

Initial disposition and treatment

Overview of management of fever in infants ≤ 60 days of age [2][14]
Age of infant Empiric antibiotics Admission
≤ 7 days
  • Usually
  • Yes
8– 21 days
  • Yes
  • Yes
22– 28 days
  • Recommended for most patients
  • Usually; select patients may be managed at home.
29– 60 days
  • Required if urine or CSF abnormal
  • Consider for other patients.
  • Required if CSF abnormal
  • Consider for all other patients.

≤ 7 days of agetoggle arrow icon

  • Etiologies of fever in this age group depend on:
    • If the infant is term or premature [15]
    • Onset of symptoms after birth
    • If the infection is community-acquired or hospital-acquired [16]
    • Whether the mother had suspected or confirmed infections prior to delivery
  • Manage in consultation with a specialist (neonatology, infectious disease). [14]

8-21 days of agetoggle arrow icon

The following guidance pertains to well-appearing infants; for all other infants, see “Management of the ill-appearing febrile infant ≤ 60 days of age.”

Approach [2]

Empiric antibiotics for infants 8–21 days of age [2]

In febrile neonates 8–21 days of age, always obtain a full workup for infection (i.e, urinalysis, blood culture, and lumbar puncture), administer empiric antibiotics, and admit to the hospital. [2]

22-28 days of agetoggle arrow icon

The following guidance pertains to well-appearing infants; for all other infants, see “Management of the ill-appearing febrile infant ≤ 60 days of age.”

Approach [2]

Initial treatment

Treatment is determined by inflammatory markers, urinalysis, and CSF analysis (if performed).

Empiric antibiotics for neonates 22–28 days of age

Home observation criteria for infants 22–28 days of age

  • Consider home observation after a single dose of parenteral empiric antibiotics if all of the following are present:
  • No barriers to treatment and follow-up are present, i.e. all parents and caregivers:
    • Express understanding of care instructions
    • Can obtain all prescribed medications
    • Are able to attend follow-up in 24 hours
    • Have reliable transportation for immediate follow-up if the infant worsens

Neonates 22–28 days of age cannot be observed at home unless a full work-up (i.e., inflammatory markers, blood cultures, urinalysis, and CSF analysis) is normal and a single dose of parenteral antibiotics (typically ceftriaxone) has been administered. [2]

29-60 days of agetoggle arrow icon

The following guidance pertains to well-appearing infants; for all other infants, see “Management of the ill-appearing febrile infant ≤ 60 days of age.”

Approach [2]

Initial treatment [2]

CSF analysis is only considered for infants with abnormal inflammatory markers; therefore, management differs between infants with normal inflammatory markers and those with abnormal ones.

Abnormal inflammatory markers

Normal inflammatory markers

  • Abnormal urinalysis
    • Administer oral antibiotics.
    • Observe either in hospital or at home with follow-up in 12–24 hours.
  • Normal urinalysis: Observe at home.

Febrile infants 29–60 days of age with normal urinalysis and normal inflammatory markers do not need a lumbar puncture or antibiotics and can be observed at home. [2]

Empiric antibiotics for infants 29–60 days of age

Parenteral antibiotics [2]

Oral antibiotics [2]

Home observation criteria for infants 29–60 days of age

  • Home observation without empiric antibiotics if all of the following are present:
  • Consider home observation with empiric antibiotics if CSF analysis is normal (or not performed) and one of the following is present:
  • No barriers to treatment and follow-up are present, i.e. all parents and caregivers:
    • Express understanding of care instructions
    • Can obtain all prescribed medications
    • Are able to attend follow-up in 24 hours
    • Have reliable transportation for immediate follow-up if the infant worsens

Ongoing managementtoggle arrow icon

Tailor antimicrobial therapies if a pathogen is isolated.

Infant improving [2]

  • Identified pathogen: Continue treatment per guidance.
  • All other patients
    • Stop empiric antibiotics if blood and CSF cultures are negative at 24–36 hours.
    • Discharge home if:
      • Clinical appearance is good
      • HSV PCR studies, if sent, are negative

Infant not improving [2]

If the patient is not improving and/or worsening:

  • Start antibiotics, if not already started, or broaden antimicrobial coverage.
  • Consider nonbacterial infections (e.g., HSV, fungal infections) and alternative causes of fever (see “Etiology”).

In febrile infants < 60 days of age with persistent fever and/or no clinical improvement despite antibiotics and/or negative blood cultures, consider testing for neonatal HSV and initiating acyclovir even if red flag features for neonatal HSV are not present. [17]

Preventiontoggle arrow icon

Referencestoggle arrow icon

  1. Nigrovic LE, Mahajan PV, Blumberg SM, et al. The Yale Observation Scale Score and the Risk of Serious Bacterial Infections in Febrile Infants. Pediatrics. 2017; 140 (1).doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0695 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  2. Nguyen THP, Young BR, Poggel LE, Alabaster A, Greenhow TL. Roseville Protocol for the Management of Febrile Infants 7–60 Days. Hosp Pediatr. 2021; 11 (1): p.52-60.doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0187 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  3. AAP Patient Care Infant Fever. https://web.archive.org/web/20230823192635/https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/infant-fever/. Updated: August 24, 2021. Accessed: August 23, 2023.
  4. Blaney SM, Giardino AP, Orange JS, et al. Rudolph's Pediatrics, 23rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Education / Medical ; 2018
  5. Pantell RH, Roberts KB, Adams WG, et al. Evaluation and Management of Well-Appearing Febrile Infants 8 to 60 Days Old. Pediatrics. 2021; 148 (2).doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052228 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  6. Kenaley KM, Greenspan J, Aghai ZH. Exclusive breast feeding and dehydration fever in newborns during the first days of life. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 33 (4): p.593-597.doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1497605 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  7. Walls R, Hockberger R, Gausche-Hill M, Erickson TB, Wilcox SR. Rosen's Emergency Medicine 10th edition- Concepts and Clinical Practice E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences ; 2022
  8. Ershad M, Mostafa A, Dela Cruz M, Vearrier D. Neonatal Sepsis. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2019; 7 (3): p.83-90.doi: 10.1007/s40138-019-00188-z . | Open in Read by QxMD
  9. Mace SE, Gemme SR, Valente JH, et al. Clinical Policy for Well-Appearing Infants and Children Younger Than 2 Years of Age Presenting to the Emergency Department With Fever. Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 67 (5): p.625-639.e13.doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.01.042 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  10. Kliegman RM, Geme JS. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 2-Volume Set. Elsevier ; 2019: p. 3623-3633
  11. Burnham MM, Goodlin-Jones BL, Gaylor EE, Anders TF. Nighttime sleep-wake patterns and self-soothing from birth to one year of age: a longitudinal intervention study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002; 43 (6): p.713-725.doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00076 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  12. Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE, et al. Management of Neonates Born at ≥35 0/7 Weeks’ Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis. Pediatrics. 2018; 142 (6).doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2894 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  13. Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE, et al. Management of Neonates Born at ≤34 6/7 Weeks’ Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis. Pediatrics. 2018; 142 (6).doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2896 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  14. Giannoni E, Agyeman PKA, Stocker M, et al. Neonatal Sepsis of Early Onset, and Hospital-Acquired and Community-Acquired Late Onset: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study. J Pediatr. 2018; 201: p.106-114.e4.doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.048 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  15. Mittal S, Muthusami S, Marlowe L, et al. Neonatal Fever in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021; 38 (1): p.43-47.doi: 10.1097/pec.0000000000002601 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  16. Briggs-Steinberg C, Roth P. Early-Onset Sepsis in Newborns. Pediatr Rev. 2023; 44 (1): p.14-22.doi: 10.1542/pir.2020-001164 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  17. Sur DKC, Chande ND. Immunizations in Pregnancy: Updated Recommendations. Am Fam Physician. 2020; 102 (4): p.205-206.
  18. Kimberlin DW. Neonatal Herpes Simplex Infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004; 17 (1): p.1-13.doi: 10.1128/cmr.17.1.1-13.2004 . | Open in Read by QxMD

Icon of a lock3 free articles remaining

You have 3 free member-only articles left this month. Sign up and get unlimited access.
 Evidence-based content, created and peer-reviewed by physicians. Read the disclaimer